Search

Although simple-hinged flaps represent optimal high-lift systems for reducing cruise drag, previous attempts to design flow control systems enabling such technology in transport aircraft have been unsuccessful. This is largely because such systems generally require a tradeoff between (a) the ability to achieve the required lift performance, and (b) possessing sufficiently low pneumatic power to enable feasible aircraft system integration (i.e., avoiding excess weight penalties associated with high pneumatic power). For example, electrically powered AFC systems (e.g., plasma actuators, synthetic jet actuators) have practical power requirements, but with limited control authority, making such systems ineffective for highly deflected flaps. On the other hand, circulation control systems can provide necessary lift for airfoils or wings with high flap deflections, but require too much pneumatic power for aircraft integration. NASA’s HELP AFC system represents a breakthrough in flow separation control technology – to efficiently achieve necessary lift performances while requiring low pneumatic power relative to alternative flow control techniques. NASA’s HELP AFC system uses a unique two-row actuator approach comprised of upstream sweeping jet (SWJ) actuators and downstream discrete jets, which share the same air supply plenum. The upstream (row 1) SWJ actuators provide good spanwise flow-control coverage with relatively mass flow, effectively pre-conditioning the boundary layer such that the downstream (row 2) discrete jets achieve better flow control authority. The two row actuator system, working together, produce a total aerodynamic lift greater than the sum of each row acting individually. The result is a system that generates sufficient lift performance for simple-hinged flaps with pneumatic power requirements low enough to enable aircraft integration.

Prototype thermal control valves for the next generation spacesuit were challenged in maintaining precise thermal control, so engineers created a design that functions like a traditional ball valve but added tapered-valley contours to the ball that yields a variable orifice which is more predictable at controlling flow. The key differences between the TCBV and traditional v-channel ball valves are that this technology has one inlet and two outlets allowing the split-flow of fluids whereas traditional v-channel valves only have one inlet and one outlet. Additionally, traditional v-channel ball valves don’t enable the full flow rate of a given system while this technology does. The ball valve is held in place within the TCBV using two PTFE seats compressed by spring-loaded side plates. The hole in the middle of the ball valve and adjoining tapered valleys mate with the PTFE seats to create varying sized orifices depending on valve position. Specially designed O-ring seals surrounding the ball valve assembly allow the seats to move within the pocket while preventing internal leakage. In this technology’s spacesuit application, coolant is fed to the ported ball valve where the coolant is apportioned to each valve housing exit either primarily feeding the cooling and ventilation garment or the bypass circuit back to the spacesuit’s thermal cooling system. The apportionment is determined by the astronaut’s manual valve adjustment or automatically by the suit.